The internet stores again via a $ ap rocky. Especially about photos of the rapper outside of a court building in Los Angeles.
What a $ Ap Rocky is in court, it was best to summarize it on Instagram: “We only get the news that in addition to two reasons for attack with a semi -automatic weapon, a $ Ap Rocky was accused of looking too damn cool at the courtyard, one Pass. “
Even if he was exposed to 24 years ago in prison, Rihanna’s husband cuts a uniquely fine figure. As always, he caught Suave this week with a head to foot Saint Laurent. The fashion brand proudly took up the pictures in a press release. The fashion community is in Thrall: the sunglasses! The lapel! The trench coat!
But Rocky is hardly the first celebrity to make the courtroom into her catwalk. When Winona Ryder was charged with Grand Theft and vandalism for theft of Marc Jacobs Clothing worth $ 5,000 in 2001 and Mary Janes. In 2015, Jacobs made her the face of his brand: the kleptomania of a woman is another marketing stick.
Fashion and the courtroom have long been natural bedding. The former is about seduction, presentation, an argument for themselves. The latter is about only output desserts. In short, both are about serving. In recent years, top -class cases such as Wagatha Christie and Gwyneth Paltrow have made this link more obvious than ever.
Name the court of public opinion or just court proceedings: a long time ago, research found that less attractive defendants are found guilty than their well -proven counterparts. Many on the Internet believe that Luigi Mangione and 26-year-old Country Club heritage could be accused of murdering Brian Thompson, the former CEO of Unitedhealthcare, by simply changing the jury with his good appearance. Fashion – whose task it is to improve and increase the appearance – could influence a jury by the same token and decide a sentence.
Best starting value
Sometimes a good lawyer is simply not enough: you also need a good stylist. And in celebrity exams, the right styling can be the difference between a career and a renaissance. When the retired optician Terry Sanderson was comparable to the slopes of the Deer Valley after skiing in Gwyneth Paltrow she Who had pushed with him), which not only his ridiculous nature (so entertaining, a hit-london musical) or the fact of the A-List status of Paltrow. It was the fact that it was perfectly designed.
Your performance (“I lost half a day of skiing”), mannerisms (chasing the lips) and costume (a Paean to Stealth richness, which seemed to say: “This is not the outfit of someone who has ever lost control would be of her skis ”) seemed to work on the jury and to earn her best press in Paltrow for years. It also had the sales for the series, Loro Piana and her own GOOP G label increased. Paltrow itself is now the face of … Saint Laurent.
For an example, take the Wagatha Christie attempt at home (which, like Paltrows, produced a HIT -West -Show). The day on which Rebekah Vardy was accused of Coleen Rooney to have sold her secrets to the press – diving in a Prada dress of £ 1,780 to the royal dishes of justice and £ 1,245 McQueen Blazer, Rooney opted for a modest , 32 -pound number of Zara. Vardy disguised himself as unfair and irreconcilable; Rooney, who seemed better to understand the effects of the experiment on the popular culture and what it would mean in the long term for her reputation. Apparently it worked. Rooney won the case and earned £ 1.5 million last year for the appearance of i’M a celebrity. (Although Vardy won it personally for me with the £ 2,095 yellow co-fold suit from Alessandra Rich, she wore on the last day of the process.)
It’s not a size for everyone
There is no hard and quick rule when it comes to the court in the courtroom. American juries probably take stealth assets rather than the British (we usually prefer stealth, full stop). On the whole, different cases command different outfits. If you are a celebrity – especially a brand whose brand lies somewhere under the amorphous chess pattern “Lifestyle” – what you carry to try to deepen and expand your image as it can contribute to it, it To thwart and undercut.
Sometimes this is the right strategy: when Nigella Lawson solved her classic sartorial guide for a reserved black outfit when he appeared against the former helper of her ex-husband twelve years ago.
Elisabetta and Francesca Grillo were accused of underestimating hundreds of thousands of pounds by Charles Saatchi’s bank account via personnel credit cards. In a hearing before the procedure, the sisters informed the judge that Lawson had allowed them to go a ham on Bond Street to hide their drug use from Saatchi (they claimed that they used cocaine). The post, which commented on the selection of Lawson’s outfit for her cross -interpretation, described the look “sober”.
The Grillo sisters won the process. But it was Lawson who won the affection of the public. If Rocky loses his case, he will certainly have won our hearts. The right suit can turn a story: Search Google for “A $ ap rocky f-“. The first result is not “a $ AP Rocky face prison” (this is currently second), but “a $ ap rocky fashion”. As it should be.
I hope that for reasons of the Rocky family and all future Met Galas, he will be out of the wilderness as quickly as his namesake implies. And if he has to do civilian service, let hope pull a Naomi and serve the whole thing in couture.